• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Arrigo Risk Consulting

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Our Services
    • Mediation
    • Consulting
    • Expert Testimony
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Contact Us

Mobile Menu

Recent Comments

    Crop Insurance News and Analysis – September 18, 2019

    September 18, 2019 By //  by Kim Arrigo

    On September 18, 2019, the Risk Management Agency (RMA) issued a “2019 Claims Advisory – Contained Water.” RMA stated that it received reports concerning prevented planting eligibility on acreage affected by water contained by or in structures that are designed to contain a specific amount of water. RMA refers to section 12(c) of the Common Crop Insurance Policy Basic Provisions for the policy language and the Loss Adjustment Manual Standards Handbook for the procedures on how to administer loss determinations.

    In its action section, RMA states that approved insurance providers must determine prevented planting eligibility on a case-by-case basis, regardless of land elevation, and that AIPs must follow approved policy and procedure. RMA states that if the producer can prove that conditions exist that prevented them from planting, AIPs may pay the claim despite subsequent contained water inundating the acreage. RMA states that the loss file must contain supporting evidence and that blanket loss adjustment determinations are not allowed.

    ANALYSIS – It is unclear the purpose of this advisory since it contains so little information. Is this bulletin referring to the waterways, like the Mississippi, flooding acreage and preventing planting? Is the question low elevation versus high elevation acreage and the need to determine whether the acreage was truly prevented from planting? Is this bulletin referring to breaches of contained water structures caused by excess moisture or authorities opening dams or levees to mitigate flooding.

    From the advisory, it is unclear but the answers to these questions are necessary to make a determination of prevented planting eligibility. If the contained water structure is breached by excess moisture, and there is no negligence, then this is a natural disaster covered by the policy and the acreage should be eligible for prevented planting regardless of whether the acreage had been prevented from planting before the breach. If the contained water structures were opened to mitigate flooding, the question is whether the producers acreage would have flooded or been prevented from planting notwithstanding the opening. For example, years ago RMA allowed coverage for acreage damaged by the opening of the Morganza Spillway because the Army Corps of Engineers provided evidence that the acreage would have been damaged regardless of whether the spillway was opened and that opening the spillway reduced the damage. One assumes the same principle applies here. However, from the information provided it is hard to determine what RMA intended.

    All statements made are opinions of the author and are not intended to provide legal opinions or legal advice.

    Filed Under: Blog

    Previous Post: « Crop Insurance News and Analysis – September 16, 2019
    Next Post: Crop Insurance News and Analysis – September 24, 2019 »

    Primary Sidebar

    Recent Posts

    • Crop Insurance News and Analysis – October 23, 2020 – Final Agency Determination FAD-300, Section 6(d)(1) of the Common Crop Insurance Policy Basic Provisions
    • Crop Insurance News and Analysis – October 15, 2020 – Updated Nursery Crop Insurance Recordkeeping Frequently Asked Questions
    • Crop Insurance News and Analysis – October 13, 2020 – Commodity Exchange Price Provisions – Peanuts
    • Crop Insurance News and Analysis – September 30- October 6, 2020 – 2021 Hurricane Insurance Protection – Wind Index
    • Crop Insurance News and Analysis – September 25, 2020 – Enhanced Coverage Option

    Archives

    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019

    Footer

    CONTACT INFORMATION

    Arrigo Risk Consulting PLLC
    136 W. Dares Beach Rd. #115
    Prince Frederick, MD 20678

    CONTACT US

    PRACTICE AREAS

    • Mediation
    • Consulting
    • Expert Testimony
    • About Us
    • Our Services
      • Mediation
      • Consulting
      • Expert Testimony
    • Blog
    • Resources
    • Contact Us

    Copyright © 2025