• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Arrigo Risk Consulting

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Our Services
    • Mediation
    • Consulting
    • Expert Testimony
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Contact Us

Mobile Menu

Recent Comments

    Crop Insurance News and Analysis – March 17, 2020 – FAD-293b and 293c – Hybrid Seed Corn

    April 15, 2020 By //  by Kim Arrigo

    On March 17, 2020, the Risk Management Agency (RMA) issued two Final Agency Determinations: FAD-293b and FAD-293c, regarding the Hybrid Seed Corn Crop Provisions (Crop Provisions). https://www.rma.usda.gov/en/Policy-and-Procedure/Final-Agency-Determinations/Hybrid-Seed-Corn-Crop-Provisions-12d-FAD-293b; https://www.rma.usda.gov/en/Policy-and-Procedure/Final-Agency-Determinations/Hybrid-Seed-Corn-Crop-Provisions-12e-FAD-293c. Both FAD-293b and FAD-293c involved an interpretation of production to count under section 12(d) and 12(e) of the Crop Provisions. The first requestor stated that production to be counted as seed production and non-seed production does not include payment to a producer that are not determinable as a fixed or final amount of bushels or dollars as of the time planting is complete and are based on an amount of imputed, and not actual bushels of non-seed corn with the amount of bushels being determined formulaically with respect to location-specific average yields.

    The second requestor states if a policyholder is provided with a minimum guarantee that is to be calculated by a formula outlined in the seed corn contract wherein the payment is based on a percentage of location-specific average harvested yields for the year at a to-be-determined price, then such payment, if any, must be taken into account for claim purposes when determining the “amount of insurance per acre” so as to properly calculate any indemnity that may be owed. 

    RMA states that it agrees in part with the first requestor’s interpretation of sections 12(d) and 12(e) that payment, including minimum contract payments, associated with a policyholders seed contract are not used to determine production to count. RMA states that minimum contract payments are used to determine the amount of insurance in accordance with section 1 of the Crop Provisions.

    ANALYSIS – RMA is correct that minimum contract payments are used to reduce the amount of insurance and are not counted as production to count for seed or non-seed production. However, it appears that the fundamental dispute is what is considered a minimum contract payment and the first requestor suggests that minimum contract payments do not include payments that cannot be determined as of the time of planting or that are based on an amount of imputed bushels determined formulaically from location-specific acreage. The second requestor states that payment based on an amount of imputed bushels determined formulaically from location-specific acreage must be taken into account for claim purposes when determining the amount of insurance.

    For the most part, this issue was addressed in FAD-293a. RMA has determined that the minimum guaranteed payment must be determined not later than the acreage report. However, RMA also stated that any payment made to the insured by the processor regardless of the quantity of seed produced would be considered a minimum guaranteed payment. While not specifically addressing the point, RMA’s determinations in FAD-293a would seem to reject the second requestor’s interpretation that the minimum guaranteed payment could be based on a formula in the contract whereby the payment is based on a percentage of a location specific average harvested production for the year at a to be determined price. The second requestor’s formula would seem to be based on the amount of production from at least some of the acreage and would not qualify as a minimum guaranteed payment under RMA’s interpretation.

    All statements made are opinions of the author and are not intended to provide legal opinions or legal advice.

    Filed Under: Blog

    Previous Post: « Crop Insurance News and Analysis – March 17, 2020 – Final Agency Determinations: FAD-293a – Hybrid Seed Corn Crop Provisions
    Next Post: Crop Insurance News and Analysis – March 27, 2020 – COVID-19 »

    Primary Sidebar

    Recent Posts

    • Crop Insurance News and Analysis – October 23, 2020 – Final Agency Determination FAD-300, Section 6(d)(1) of the Common Crop Insurance Policy Basic Provisions
    • Crop Insurance News and Analysis – October 15, 2020 – Updated Nursery Crop Insurance Recordkeeping Frequently Asked Questions
    • Crop Insurance News and Analysis – October 13, 2020 – Commodity Exchange Price Provisions – Peanuts
    • Crop Insurance News and Analysis – September 30- October 6, 2020 – 2021 Hurricane Insurance Protection – Wind Index
    • Crop Insurance News and Analysis – September 25, 2020 – Enhanced Coverage Option

    Archives

    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019

    Footer

    CONTACT INFORMATION

    Arrigo Risk Consulting PLLC
    136 W. Dares Beach Rd. #115
    Prince Frederick, MD 20678

    CONTACT US

    PRACTICE AREAS

    • Mediation
    • Consulting
    • Expert Testimony
    • About Us
    • Our Services
      • Mediation
      • Consulting
      • Expert Testimony
    • Blog
    • Resources
    • Contact Us

    Copyright © 2025