• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Arrigo Risk Consulting

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Our Services
    • Mediation
    • Consulting
    • Expert Testimony
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Contact Us

Mobile Menu

Recent Comments

    Crop Insurance News and Analysis – August 17, 2020 – Haying, Grazing or Chopping Cover Crops Early

    August 29, 2020 By //  by Kim Arrigo

    On August 17, 2020, the Risk Management Agency (RMA) announced that farmers who planted cover crops on prevented planted acres in select counties in North and South Dakota will be permitted to hay, graze or chop those fields beginning Sept. 1 rather than Nov. 1. https://www.rma.usda.gov/News-Room/Press/Press-Releases/2020-News/USDA-Allows-Some-Farmers-to-Hay-Graze-or-Chop-Cover-Crops-Early-This-Year. RMA stated that the change is being made because of excessive moisture and flooding in 42 counties in the two states.  RMA states that the change still will allow farmers to maintain eligibility for their full 2020 prevented planting indemnity. RMA states the qualifying counties include: 

    North Dakota: Barnes, Benson, Bottineau, Cass, Dickey, Eddy, Foster, Grand Forks, Griggs, Kidder, La Moure, Mcintosh, Nelson, Ramsey, Ransom, Rolette, Sargent, Sheridan, Steele, Stutsman, Towner, Traill, and Wells 

    South Dakota: Beadle, Brown, Brule, Campbell, Clark, Codington, Day, Edmunds, Faulk, Hand, Hanson, Hyde, McPherson, Marshall, Potter, Roberts, Sanborn, Spink, and Walworth 

    RMA states that flooding and excessive rainfall in parts of the country have resulted in a significant amount of prevented planting claims under Federal crop insurance. RMA states that given these extraordinary weather events and the need for animal feed, flexibility around the use of a cover crop planted on prevented planted acreage for haying, grazing and cutting for silage, haylage and baleage has become necessary.

    ANALYSIS – RMA did this on a wider scale in June 2019. RMA is moving the date by which cover crops could be hayed, grazed, chopped, etc. without affecting the prevented planting payment from November 1 to September 1. RMA is also treating cutting for silage, baylage, and haylage the same as haying and grazing even though they involve harvesting the crop is defined by the Crop Provisions. RMA does not explain its authority or rational basis to make this change. With respect to the applicable law, section 508A(c)(1) of the Federal Crop Insurance Act (FCIA) states:

    (1) Except as provided in subsections (d) and (e), if a first crop insured under this subtitle in a crop year is prevented from being planted, the producer of the first crop may elect one of the following options:

    (A) The producer may (i) elect to not plant a second crop on the same acreage for harvest in the same crop year; and (ii) subject to paragraph (4), collect an indemnity payment that is equal to 100 percent of the prevented planting guarantee for the acreage for the first crop.

    (B) The producer may (i) plant a second crop on the same acreage for harvest in the same crop year; and (ii) subject to paragraphs (4) and (5), collect an indemnity payment established by the Corporation for the first crop, but not to exceed 35 percent of the prevented planting guarantee for the acreage for the first crop.

    Cover crops are not referenced in section 508A(c)(1) of the FCIA.  RMA introduced cover crops in the definition of “second crop” in the policy, which, for the 2020 crop year, states in part “A cover crop, planted after a first insured crop and planted for the purpose of haying, grazing or otherwise harvesting in any manner or that is hayed or grazed during the crop year, or that is otherwise harvested is considered to be a second crop. A cover crop that is covered by FSA’s noninsured crop disaster assistance program (NAP) or receives other USDA benefits associated with forage crops will be considered as planted for the purpose of haying, grazing or otherwise harvesting. A crop meeting the conditions stated herein will be considered to be a second crop regardless of whether or not it is insured.”

    In the definition of “second crop,” RMA is defining “harvest” as haying, grazing or otherwise harvesting in any manner and stating that cover crops who meet these conditions are second crops.  This is important when looking at section 508A(c)(1) and whether there is “harvest on the same acreage in the same crop year.”  RMA has always allowed haying and grazing after November 1 without affecting the prevented planting payment because it was determined by RMA that in normal conditions harvest would be completed and the insurance period would have ended. Since the insurance period had ended, any haying, grazing, etc. after November 1 would be considered the next crop year. Therefore, producers who grazed, hayed, etc. after November 1 could keep their full prevented planting payment because the crop was not harvested in the same crop year.

    In this press release, RMA is moving the date to allow haying, grazing, cutting for silage, haylage, bailage, etc. to September 1 but most applicable crops will only be beginning or in the middle of harvest so this haying, grazing, cutting for silage, haylage, bailage, etc. will occur in the same crop year. Under the FCIA and the regulations, if crop is harvested on the same acreage in the same crop year, the prevented planting payment must be reduced. However, it appears that RMA is disregarding the statute and regulations and is allowing a full prevented planting payment when a second crop is planted for harvest on the same acreage in the same crop year. They may have some new authority to disregard the law but if so, it should have been stated in the bulletin.

    The fact that RMA is limiting the number of counties does not change the fact that the law requires that a prevented planting payment be reduced if a second crop is harvested in the same crop year and cover crops that are hayed, grazed or chopped are considered second crops and haying, grazing, chopping and cutting for silage, haylage or bailage is considered harvest.

    All statements made are opinions of the author and are not intended to provide legal opinions or legal advice.

    Filed Under: Blog

    Previous Post: « Crop Insurance News and Analysis – July 6, 2020 – Final Agency Determination: FAD-298
    Next Post: Crop Insurance News and Analysis – August 19, 2020 – Improving Prevented Planting Coverage »

    Primary Sidebar

    Recent Posts

    • Crop Insurance News and Analysis – October 23, 2020 – Final Agency Determination FAD-300, Section 6(d)(1) of the Common Crop Insurance Policy Basic Provisions
    • Crop Insurance News and Analysis – October 15, 2020 – Updated Nursery Crop Insurance Recordkeeping Frequently Asked Questions
    • Crop Insurance News and Analysis – October 13, 2020 – Commodity Exchange Price Provisions – Peanuts
    • Crop Insurance News and Analysis – September 30- October 6, 2020 – 2021 Hurricane Insurance Protection – Wind Index
    • Crop Insurance News and Analysis – September 25, 2020 – Enhanced Coverage Option

    Archives

    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019

    Footer

    CONTACT INFORMATION

    Arrigo Risk Consulting PLLC
    136 W. Dares Beach Rd. #115
    Prince Frederick, MD 20678

    CONTACT US

    PRACTICE AREAS

    • Mediation
    • Consulting
    • Expert Testimony
    • About Us
    • Our Services
      • Mediation
      • Consulting
      • Expert Testimony
    • Blog
    • Resources
    • Contact Us

    Copyright © 2023