• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Arrigo Risk Consulting

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Our Services
    • Mediation
    • Consulting
    • Expert Testimony
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Contact Us

Mobile Menu

Recent Comments

    Crop Insurance News and Analysis – June 12, 2019

    June 12, 2019 By //  by Kim Arrigo

    There have been several articles published the last few days regarding prevented planting and whether Secretary Perdue will allow a portion of the new disaster legislation funding to be used to increase the amount of preventing planting coverage. Currently prevented planting coverage stands at 55-60 percent of the guarantee for corn and soybeans and there is talk of possibly increasing the amount to 90 percent of the guarantee. There have been questions raised in articles whether this action is authorized in the disaster legislation and not having read it, I express no opinion.

    The question is will history repeat itself. In 1995, there was widespread prevented planting. At the time, producers received a prevented planting payment of 50 percent of the guarantee as long as nothing was planted on the acreage. In June of 1995, long after the November 30, 1994 contract change date, the sales closing date, the planting date, and when losses had occurred, USDA elected to increase the prevented planting coverage. For acreage for which was left with nothing planted or planted to a cover crop that would not be harvested, hayed or grazed, producer’s coverage increased to 75 percent of the guarantee (with a couple of exceptions). For acreage the producer planted a cover crop that would be hayed or grazed, the producer received a 50 percent of the guarantee (with a couple of exceptions). For acreage the producer planted a second crop, the producer receive 25 percent of the guarantee. USDA also allows payment on conserving use acreage, which was previously ineligible for prevented planting (with a couple of exceptions). https://legacy.rma.usda.gov/news/managers/1995/mgr95028.txt.

    The approved insurance providers (AIP) complained that these changes were in breach of the Standard Reinsurance Agreement (SRA) and FCIC agreed to hold them harmless, which meant they were not responsible for any losses that exceeded to coverage that was in effect as of the contract change date. The problem was FCIC had no mechanism to directly pay producers for these additional losses so the AIPs made the payments and were reimbursed by FCIC through a complex formula. For the 1996 crop year, FCIC published a regulation by November 30, 1995, that incorporated some of the changes made to prevented planting in 1995. Some of the AIPs again sought to be held harmless and FCIC denied their request on the grounds that it had made the changes in accordance with the contract change date. The AIPs appealed and these appeals were not resolved in 2008.https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914b2aeadd7b04934761499. In the meantime, a considerable amount of resources had been expended litigating these appeals.

    It appears that USDA is again contemplating increasing prevented planting coverage after the contract change date, the sales closing date, the planting date, and when losses occurred.  The difference is that in 2019, USDA has a separate funding source for the payments, allegedly the disaster legislation, which it did not have in 1995. This means that USDA could simply provide a separate payment to producers to cover the additional coverage for prevented planting. This would avoid the SRA issues and challenges by the AIPs. If they include this additional coverage in the existing prevented planting payments, it could conceivably start the whole mess over again. Having dealt with this for 13 years, I know which way I would prefer.

    All statements made are opinions of the author and are not intended to provide legal opinions or legal advice.

    Filed Under: Blog

    Previous Post: « Crop Insurance News and Analysis – June 5, 2019
    Next Post: Crop Insurance News and Analysis – June 13, 2019 »

    Primary Sidebar

    Recent Posts

    • Crop Insurance News and Analysis – October 23, 2020 – Final Agency Determination FAD-300, Section 6(d)(1) of the Common Crop Insurance Policy Basic Provisions
    • Crop Insurance News and Analysis – October 15, 2020 – Updated Nursery Crop Insurance Recordkeeping Frequently Asked Questions
    • Crop Insurance News and Analysis – October 13, 2020 – Commodity Exchange Price Provisions – Peanuts
    • Crop Insurance News and Analysis – September 30- October 6, 2020 – 2021 Hurricane Insurance Protection – Wind Index
    • Crop Insurance News and Analysis – September 25, 2020 – Enhanced Coverage Option

    Archives

    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019

    Footer

    CONTACT INFORMATION

    Arrigo Risk Consulting PLLC
    136 W. Dares Beach Rd. #115
    Prince Frederick, MD 20678

    CONTACT US

    PRACTICE AREAS

    • Mediation
    • Consulting
    • Expert Testimony
    • About Us
    • Our Services
      • Mediation
      • Consulting
      • Expert Testimony
    • Blog
    • Resources
    • Contact Us

    Copyright © 2023