• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Arrigo Risk Consulting

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Our Services
    • Mediation
    • Consulting
    • Expert Testimony
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Contact Us

Mobile Menu

Recent Comments

    Crop Insurance News and Analysis – April 16, 2020 – Publication of Whole-Farm Revenue Protection Interpretations of Procedure

    April 30, 2020 By //  by Kim Arrigo

    On April 16, 2020, the Risk Management Agency (RMA) published Product Management Bulletin: PM-20-024, regarding interpretations of procedures under the Whole-Farm Revenue Protection (WFRP) program. https://www.rma.usda.gov/en/Policy-and-Procedure/Bulletins-and-Memos/2020/PM-20-024. RMA states that the WFRP policy states that producers and approved insurance (AIPs) providers can obtain interpretations of policy or procedure in accordance with 7 C.F.R. part 400, subpart X. RMA states that requests for interpretations of policies published in the Federal Register are considered binding on all participants, while requests for interpretations of other policies or procedures are considered binding only on the parties to the dispute. RMA states that WFRP is not published in the Federal Register so interpretations are only binding on participants to the dispute.

    RMA states that it has receive multiple requests for interpretations of the same policy provisions, sometimes by the same parties. RMA states that while they are not considered binding on all parties, section 33(a)(1)(iii) of the WFRP policy states that the interpretations are generally applicable. RMA states that because the determination is a matter of general applicability, requests are considered solely on the basis of policy and procedure and are not viewed in light of any factual circumstance.

    RMA states that it has determined that it is permissible to publish the interpretations of procedures relating to WFRP for informational purposes and to reduce administrative burdens. RMA states that, while not binding on all participants, publication of the interpretations of procedures allows RMA to provide guidance on specific topics, which may otherwise prompt requests for interpretations of procedures. RMA states this is intended to facilitate program participants and stakeholders, including the arbitrator, mediator, judge, or National Appeals Division (NAD), to resolve disputes without going through the interpretation of procedures process. Program participants may still request a binding interpretation of procedure for a particular circumstance, although precedent set by previous interpretations of procedures on a specific topic will be applied by RMA to further interpretations on that topic.

    ANALYSIS – As an initial matter, the determination of whether the interpretation is binding on all program participants or just the participants to a dispute is determined by whether the policy is a regulation or not. To be considered a regulations the policy must be published in the Code of Federal Regulations, not the Federal Register. Policies can be published as proposed rules in the Federal Register but they are not effective and do not have the force of law necessary before they are binding on all participants. Once the policy has been published in the Code of Federal Regulations interpretations of their provisions will be binding on all participants.

    While RMA may publish the interpretations of procedures on its website, subpart X expressly states they are not binding on anyone other than the parties to the dispute in which it is requested. Therefore, at best, publication of the interpretations of procedures may inform producers or AIPs of the futility of continuing with a dispute when they know what the interpretation of the policy will be. However, nothing in this bulletin obligates any arbitrator, mediator, judge or NAD accept these published interpretations of procedure or apply them to any other dispute. According to the WFRP policy and subpart X, producers and AIPs are still required to obtain interpretations of procedures for each dispute.

    All statements made are opinions of the author and are not intended to provide legal opinions or legal advice.

    Filed Under: Blog

    Previous Post: « Crop Insurance News and Analysis – April 10, 2020 – COVID-19 and Impact of Production Reporting Dates
    Next Post: Crop Insurance News and Analysis – April 17, 2020 – Expedited Release of Livestock Gross Margin Actual Ending Values »

    Primary Sidebar

    Recent Posts

    • Crop Insurance News and Analysis – October 23, 2020 – Final Agency Determination FAD-300, Section 6(d)(1) of the Common Crop Insurance Policy Basic Provisions
    • Crop Insurance News and Analysis – October 15, 2020 – Updated Nursery Crop Insurance Recordkeeping Frequently Asked Questions
    • Crop Insurance News and Analysis – October 13, 2020 – Commodity Exchange Price Provisions – Peanuts
    • Crop Insurance News and Analysis – September 30- October 6, 2020 – 2021 Hurricane Insurance Protection – Wind Index
    • Crop Insurance News and Analysis – September 25, 2020 – Enhanced Coverage Option

    Archives

    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019

    Footer

    CONTACT INFORMATION

    Arrigo Risk Consulting PLLC
    136 W. Dares Beach Rd. #115
    Prince Frederick, MD 20678

    CONTACT US

    PRACTICE AREAS

    • Mediation
    • Consulting
    • Expert Testimony
    • About Us
    • Our Services
      • Mediation
      • Consulting
      • Expert Testimony
    • Blog
    • Resources
    • Contact Us

    Copyright © 2023